I Don't Speak Geek
It’s been roughly six weeks now since I started writing up. Dozens of coffees, teas, late nights and bleary eyes later, I’m technically halfway through the process, having finished my first four chapters. I’m well aware that I’m an extremely slow writer, probably because I get really hung up on how every single statement is expressed, and that the document flows logically. And I’m more than happy to admit that if my time management skills were better (or existent!), I’d be much further through the process. Yet even though I can no longer keep track of my references (now numbering nine semi-categorised piles), and even though my “To Read”, “To Listen To” and “To Watch” piles are all in excess of half a dozen books, CDs or DVDs respectively, I haven’t been gripped by the panic that regularly used to set in during times of trouble (ie. swot vac) in undergrad.
In a way, this type of writing is much more enjoyable than writing a manuscript. With manuscripts, it’s as much about what you don’t say (ahem, or reveal?) as what you actually do choose to present. This often means that manuscripts only represent a fraction of what you might have slaved over for the better part of six months or more, and you seldom get a chance to talk about all the limitations of your work, hardships and what still needs to be done – if you do, you just end up drawing attention to the holes in your work. The peculiar beauty of a thesis is that all these concerns about wasted data and limited scope for discussion go right out the proverbial lab window. If you’re willing to tell the complete story, you can actually create a really enjoyable yarn and include more or less everything you’ve done, whether it’s been successful or not. As one slovenly and feral, yet very wise postgrad once pointed out to me, “No one ever gets to hear about negative data.” After all, isn’t part of being a good scientist all about being upfront about holes and room for improvement in your own work?? And having an open mind as to new things you could try??
I’ve often seriously questioned whether my temperament is suitable for the field I’m heading into. Amongst all the snivelly networking, ego massaging, back scratching and boys’ clubs, I’m content to stay away from it and naively hope that maybe good work will speak for itself. Maybe?
In a way, this type of writing is much more enjoyable than writing a manuscript. With manuscripts, it’s as much about what you don’t say (ahem, or reveal?) as what you actually do choose to present. This often means that manuscripts only represent a fraction of what you might have slaved over for the better part of six months or more, and you seldom get a chance to talk about all the limitations of your work, hardships and what still needs to be done – if you do, you just end up drawing attention to the holes in your work. The peculiar beauty of a thesis is that all these concerns about wasted data and limited scope for discussion go right out the proverbial lab window. If you’re willing to tell the complete story, you can actually create a really enjoyable yarn and include more or less everything you’ve done, whether it’s been successful or not. As one slovenly and feral, yet very wise postgrad once pointed out to me, “No one ever gets to hear about negative data.” After all, isn’t part of being a good scientist all about being upfront about holes and room for improvement in your own work?? And having an open mind as to new things you could try??
I’ve often seriously questioned whether my temperament is suitable for the field I’m heading into. Amongst all the snivelly networking, ego massaging, back scratching and boys’ clubs, I’m content to stay away from it and naively hope that maybe good work will speak for itself. Maybe?
7 Comments:
sadly yoss, the history of science is written only by winners with the losers left in the dust. it's all well and good to hold the quest for scientific truths as an ideal, but in reality, the truth is as fallible as the people who interpret it.
btw: congrats on writing so much of your thesis already - most impressed!
dang!
jfox> A frustrating truth that sadly isn't restricted to the scientific community- just take a look at those who govern.
Somewhat more encouraging in your quests though: My exsupe/boss put it best when he said that though you need a ruthless drive to succeed in research, even genuinely nice scientists (I guess he meant those who abide by moral laws/have a conscience) make it without denegrating themselves in the same manner as some of their lo brau (bender's drink of choice!) colleagues and are still successful/respected in their field.
Just like anything... you have to learn to filter out the crap!
All the best ladies- I am mighty proud of you all for getting through such a challenging (and rewarding) phase in your studies/career.
End Rant.
And why shouldn't your good and honest work speak for itself! i too am sick and tired of the snivelling networking that goes part and parcel with this job - i know i've never been good at it nor the ego stroking, or the back scratching that people feed off one another like hungry vultures and the boys' network - geez where do i start with that one??
Let me also just say that you're are far from being alone in questioning your suitability for this profession (trade?), but i think people such as yourself are the very people who should be encouraged to stay as you have all the right qualities that people traditionally held to science. That is their ability (nay responsibility!) to uncover facts and report them as they see them - whether it makes for an interesting story or one that may only interest a few or disputes a previously held maxim or even blazes trails. It shouldn't be about who puts the best spin on a story (Who spins wins? sounds like a game show to me). And I wholeheartedly agree with you on the thesis writing process, in my experience telling the story warts and all (what worked, what didn't, limitations, implications, contradictions, etc.) makes for a much more intersting story to tell that gives you a chance to showcase your independent thinking and critiquing skills and ones that examiners will really appreciate and applaud. Good stuff!
first of all, congratulations, yoss on writing so much of your thesis! you put me to shame and slight panic as i have six weeks *left*. *silent scream of horror*
as others have already said, this culture isn't restricted to science! there seems to be no escaping the spin and schmooze which is so very tiresome and has little to do with your scientific ability. yet we feel - we *have* a greater responsibility in science to be as open and truthful as possible - really, it is an obligation to ourselves and to the community, lay and scientific that often takes our work at face value. no matter whether the ideal taught to us in school isn't so prevalent in real life - we can only be true to ourselves and our ideals. regardless of whether we succeed or not (and i echo serenity in that people such as yourself *do* succeed). whatever sphere of life it is it's all we can do!
It is the beauty of a thesis that it is the journey that you can and must map as much as the result. as my sup keeps telling me, it's how much understanding you show taht matters!
the irony, of course is that not many people will see a thesis! wish there could be a profound change in how things work in science...but i guess it's also a sign of the times.
all the best for the magnum opus m'dear...
well golly gosh, i had no idea when i wrote this post that so many visitors would drop in and check it out. see? good things can come out of procrastination!!
thanks a bunch to all of you for stopping by and taking the time to comment and offer encouragement and wisdom! as you all point out, we'll sadly see crappy attitudes and poor morals in whatever field we find ourselves in. m's nemesis is right that it's a matter of filtering it all out and putting the blinkers on - and if things work out, being all the more respected for it.
jfox and flygirl take note - i found the process of writing an absolute bugger to start, but once you get stuck into it, it seriously has moments of being quite enjoyable. just think of it as a lengthy discussion of your journey and tell things like they are. flygirl, your supe is absolutely right ... it is all about demonstrating your understanding, not getting the most desirable possible result.
and serenity - thanks a bunch for the wise words. couldn't agree with you more on every single point you made. here's to staying the hell away from Who Spins Wins!!
Hello Hamburgler!!
I happened to notice gegenbaueren's blog flogging and thought I'd stop by (fully clothed...Yossarian you ol' dog!)
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrat rat rat rat ratties!
Best of luck with your thesis. You know where to find me/us if you want distractions. :P
Post a Comment
<< Home